Comparison
ATS Verification vs Enhancv
Enhancv: A design-led resume builder with strong visual templates and an AI content assistant. Below is where Enhancv is better, where we are, and who should pick which.
Short answer. Pick ATS Verification for online applications through Workday, Greenhouse, Taleo and similar systems, where a beautiful two-column file is the risk. Pick Enhancv when appearance matters more than parsing: printed copies, design roles, small companies without an ATS.
| Feature | ATS Verification | Enhancv |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free scan and preview; $5 one-time download, $9 / $14 / $20 optional tiers | Free tier with watermark; Pro listed at about $19.99 a month in 2026 |
| Pricing model | One-time, nothing renews, 30-day refund | Subscription |
| Free tier | Full scan, every issue named, score, and a free on-screen preview of the rebuilt page; no signup | Free builder, downloads carry a watermark |
| What you see about ATS parsing | The raw extracted text next to your original, line by line, with each failure named | An ATS checker inside the product; no raw extracted text |
| Parse test result (2026) | Not a builder; our rebuilds are single column, standard headings, plain text | Enhancv's default templates failed parsing 30 to 45% of the time on Workday and Taleo in our 2026 test, because of two-column layouts and icons |
| Rebuild of your existing resume | Yes: your exact wording in an ATS-safe structure, Word and PDF, $5 | You rebuild inside Enhancv, and the safest templates are not the defaults |
| Bullet rewrites | Optional, $9: STAR, XYZ or PAR, approved line by line | AI content assistant |
| Job description match | Optional, $14 for one job or $20 for ten | Keyword suggestions in Pro |
| Your file after the scan | Deleted within 60 seconds; nothing stored | Stored in your account |
Enhancv prices are as listed on its site in 2026 and change; check the current page before deciding. Parse results come from our published 2026 test of six builders against Workday, Greenhouse, Lever and Taleo.
Where Enhancv is better
- The best-looking output of the six tools. For a resume you hand to a person, or for creative roles, it wins.
- Cover letters, a portfolio-style layout and a large template library in one subscription.
Where ATS Verification is better
- We are built for the opposite problem: making sure the software can read the file at all. Two-column and icon templates are the failures we catch most often.
- You see the parse damage before deciding, and the rebuild keeps your words.
- No subscription and no watermark: $5 once for a clean Word and PDF.
How the scan works
Upload your resume, no signup. In about 20 seconds you see the text an ATS extracts from it next to your original, every failure named with a fix, and a deterministic score. If it needs fixing, the rebuilt single-column version appears on screen, free, before you pay. The clean Word and PDF are $5 once. Details on the how it works page and the methodology.
Questions
Is Enhancv ATS-friendly?
Its single-column templates can be; its default templates failed 30 to 45% of the time in our 2026 Workday and Taleo tests. If you use Enhancv, choose a single-column template and run a scan before applying.
Can I check an Enhancv resume with ATS Verification?
Yes. Export it as a text-based PDF and upload it. The scan shows exactly which elements the parser lost.
Other comparisons: vs Jobscan · vs Teal · vs Rezi · vs Resume.io · vs Kickresume · vs Resume Worded · the full six-tool test